We write frequently about the difficult task retailers face in complying with the myriad state and local tax regimes in this country. State and local tax rules are ever changing, both through legislative and regulatory efforts and also through actions of administrative bodies and even the courts. For your average retailer, keeping abreast of every change can be near impossible.
For instance, last November, Cook County, Illinois approved a use tax ordinance that went into effect April 1, 2013, and imposed tax on non-titled personal property purchased outside the county for use within the county. The Cook County use tax rate was set at 1.25%, while the County’s sales tax rate on similar purchases made inside the county was only 0.75%. The language used in adopting the use tax plainly stated the County’s purpose in adopting the new tax: “WHEREAS, it is in the interest of Cook County to take steps that will level the playing field among business interests, close tax loopholes, and incentivize the purchase of non-titled personal property within the County for use within Cook County.”
A lawsuit in Cook County Circuit Court seeking to enjoin enforcement of the ordinance quickly followed. The suit was based both on the ordinance’s obvious unconstitutionality (imposing a different, higher tax rate on items purchased outside the county than the tax rate imposed on purchases made within the county plainly violates the Commerce Clause) and also on the State Constitution’s prohibition on ad valorem personal property taxes. The lawsuit also asserted that the tax base for the use tax improperly differed from that of the sales tax: the use tax was imposed on the value of goods purchased, while the sales tax was imposed on the purchase price.
While the suit was pending in court, the County revised the ordinance in June 2013, lowering the use tax rate to 0.75% and providing credit for tax paid in another jurisdiction. Then, earlier this week, on July 24, Judge Robert Lopez Cepero of the Cook County Circuit Court preliminarily enjoined the County from enforcing the use tax, finding that it likely violates both the Illinois and federal Constitutions. (Note that Judge Lopez Cepero previously presided over the lawsuit brought by the Performance Marketing Association challenging the constitutionality of the Illinois “click through” affiliate nexus law. Judge Lopez Cepero issued an order in May 2012 invalidating that statute. The “click through” affiliate nexus ruling is now on appeal before the Illinois Supreme Court. Brann & Isaacson represents the plaintiff PMA in that case.
Vendors selling into Cook County are, therefore, no longer subject to a higher tax rate than their competitors within the county. Cook County has indicated its intent to ask Judge Lopez Cepero to reconsider his decision, so we will continue to monitor developments in the case.
Friday, July 26, 2013
Thursday, July 25, 2013
Sneaky Credit Card Charges
Credit card delinquencies have gone way down to the levels of the 1990s. Some younger consumers have forgone credit cards entirely (perhaps due to their already high levels of student loan debt). For those using credit cards, though, the landscape remains buyer beware. "Grey" charges of about $14.3 billion are attached to credit card statements for subscriptions and memberships with renewal charges. A whopping 35% of credit card statements get hit with these annually.
So, whether debit or credit card, make sure that you review the statement for these charges. With the Iphone and other Apple products having such popularity, there are plenty of subscriptions through Apple that are auto renew and tied to a card. The Wall Street Journal today ran a piece about the difficulty that consumers encounter when trying to cancel renewable services (in that case, a security system). In that case, the consumer was allegedly misled into signing a contract extension. Sounds like a good case for a claim of fraud in the inducement perpaps? Misrepresentation by the security tech?
In the end, consumer vigilance is still the best tool. Be proactive with your statements. And, it is really easy to give your card number to less than scrupulous providers. In the Internet world, it is easy to click on the terms and conditions (WSJ, Those Wordy Contracts). But in many cases, consumers can prevent these debacles from ready what they sign and being careful about giving out their card numbers.
If there are charges that should not be there, it takes time to do battle on these, but contact the credit card company.
- JSM
So, whether debit or credit card, make sure that you review the statement for these charges. With the Iphone and other Apple products having such popularity, there are plenty of subscriptions through Apple that are auto renew and tied to a card. The Wall Street Journal today ran a piece about the difficulty that consumers encounter when trying to cancel renewable services (in that case, a security system). In that case, the consumer was allegedly misled into signing a contract extension. Sounds like a good case for a claim of fraud in the inducement perpaps? Misrepresentation by the security tech?
In the end, consumer vigilance is still the best tool. Be proactive with your statements. And, it is really easy to give your card number to less than scrupulous providers. In the Internet world, it is easy to click on the terms and conditions (WSJ, Those Wordy Contracts). But in many cases, consumers can prevent these debacles from ready what they sign and being careful about giving out their card numbers.
If there are charges that should not be there, it takes time to do battle on these, but contact the credit card company.
- JSM
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)